 |
APBRmetrics The statistical revolution will not be televised.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mike G
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 3294 Location: Delphi, Indiana
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:36 am Post subject: Hamed Haddadi |
|
|
Of players who have gone as many minutes (67 or 68, depending on whom to believe), the only ones with a higher season PER (30.0) are Wilt (3 times), Jordan (4), Robinson (2), Shaq (3), and McGrady (1); also LeBron and Wade, this year.
No one has ever had as many Win Shares (0.4) in as few season minutes.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/fc/tiny.cgi?id=uA3mE
In Win Shares per 1000 minutes:
6.4 Lebron
6 - Haddadi
Is anyone predicting greatness for this guy?
(I have him 10th in eW/min, between Tony Parker and Al Jefferson.) _________________ `
39% of all statistics are wrong |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kevin Pelton Site Admin
Joined: 30 Dec 2004 Posts: 954 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I believe this should have been prefaced with "In this week's edition of Small Sample Size Theater ... ." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BobboFitos
Joined: 21 Feb 2009 Posts: 136 Location: Cambridge, MA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lol, n1 _________________ -Rob |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jimmysmithhof
Joined: 29 Oct 2008 Posts: 36 Location: Chicago, Illinois
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Next great NBA center, maybe he will play 10 mpg next year _________________ Derrick Rose will be the ROTY |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
erivera7
Joined: 19 Jan 2009 Posts: 167 Location: Chicago, IL
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kevin Pelton wrote: | | I believe this should have been prefaced with "In this week's edition of Small Sample Size Theater ... ." |
Hah, hilarious. _________________ @erivera7
I cover the Orlando Magic - Magic Basketball |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KD
Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 163
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is a case of small sample size, be HH be da next D-Rob or the next Cezary Trybanski.
Still, it does bug me that, despite my best efforts, I've yet to see this guy live. I got lucky and seemed to take in half of Kendrick Perkins' Small SS in his rookie year, just out of chance and flipping around, but haven't seen a lick of this guy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike G
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 3294 Location: Delphi, Indiana
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
A small sample is a sample which is small -- not necessarily an invalid sample. I don't know anything about this guy, other than his size. He wasn't drafted, but just appeared, along with a bunch of other notable rookies in Memphis?
After a few sporadic appearances, he's been a regular off the bench. 18 min in a 2-pt loss to Den; 3 of his last 4 appearances have been in wins. Doesn't exactly look like garbage time.
If he'd gone to a US college, we'd know more. If he'd gone to Indiana, he'd be Hoosier Haddadi? _________________ `
39% of all statistics are wrong |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike G
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 3294 Location: Delphi, Indiana
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thru 68 NBA minutes:
Cezary Trybanski 3-16 FG, 8 pts, 12 reb, 11 PF, 6 blk, 5 TO
David Robinson 9-21 FG, 42 pts, 35 reb, 9 PF, 11 blk, 6 TO (74 min in 2 G)
Hamed Haddadi 12-21 FG, 38 pts, 33 reb, 11 PF, 4 blk, 4 TO _________________ `
39% of all statistics are wrong |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
back2newbelf
Joined: 21 Jun 2005 Posts: 169
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Not like it really matters in this discussion but I was very impressed by him in the Olympics, mostly by his blocking ability. He led the tournament in blocks/game and rebounds/game, the latter by a wide margin, and was also 8th in ppg with a 50.0FG% (that 50% looks quite low though, compared to many people in the list of top-scorers) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tsherkin
Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Posts: 242
|
Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He's posting about 20/18/3 and 2 blocks per-36 right now over 13 games, lol. I think what we do know is that he can block shots and rebound pretty well. Over his small sample, he's been really efficient and drawn a ton of fouls, but it's thirteen games and less than 2 dozen total FGAs, so it's not super-meaningful.
But he's big, he's got a decent NBA frame and what-not. His big problem has been that he's basically fouling out over 36 minutes and that he's just not getting in games because the Grizz are crazy. They should be playing him instead of Darko... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike G
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 3294 Location: Delphi, Indiana
|
Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used b-r.com's season search for rookie centers since 1987 who:
1) Played 50-500 minutes their first year
2) Averaged <15 mpg
3) Played at least 2 years
I took the top 10 PER's as rookies: Brad Miller, Jelani McCoy, Shawnelle Scott, Ervin Johnson, Isaac Austin, Andris Biedrins, Jabari Smith, Elden Campbell, Priest Lauderdale, Eric Riley.
This brings us to a PER of 13.4 .
For each rookie, I checked his game log and found the point at which he'd played 70+ career minutes; unless he played <70 minutes that year, in which case I used season totals.
Here are their average first-70-minute rates and their career rates:
| Code: | per36min Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk TO PF
1st 70min 15.4 10.7 1.7 .8 2.3 2.7 6.1
career 12.6 9.7 1.8 .9 1.7 2.4 5.2
career/1st70 .82 .90 1.05 1.14 .71 .89 .86 |
Ervin Johnson avg'd 17-19-4.4 (per36) in his first 70. Without Ervin in the sample, the other 9 averaged .86 and .98 for their Pts and Reb carryover.
Haddadi may be the next Ervin (not Magic) Johnson in how he converts into a regular player. That is to say, he scores/rebounds about half what he's done so far. The rest of the sample just looks like what you'd expect when guys go against better competition (i.e., starters vs subs).
Even then, TO and fouls should go down, with experience. _________________ `
39% of all statistics are wrong |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike G
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 3294 Location: Delphi, Indiana
|
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| back2newbelf wrote: | | Not like it really matters in this discussion but I was very impressed by him in the Olympics, mostly by his blocking ability. He led the tournament in blocks/game and rebounds/game, the latter by a wide margin, and was also 8th in ppg with a 50.0FG% (that 50% looks quite low though, compared to many people in the list of top-scorers) |
It only doesn't matter if this discussion isn't really about Hamed Haddadi. This is actual information you've given.
Maybe it's about 'small sample' or some kind of 'biased sample'. In college, some player reaches the Regional Finals with 70 minutes, and we talk about how good he looks. In NBA playoffs, 70 minutes off the bench may make or break a series.
Another approach, seeking comparisons of the predictive power of, say, 50-200 minutes -- from my continuing 'rookies' thread --
http://sonicscentral.com/apbrmetrics/viewtopic.php?t=1952
...
I've compared 2009 rookies' first appearance on the top-25 list (Nov. 8, or later) to their latest rates. On average, they've played more MPG, had fewer steals, turnovers, and blocks. | Code: | 1st/latest mpg Eff% Sco Reb Ast PF Stl TO Blk TRate
ratio .95 .97 .99 1.01 .99 .97 1.20 1.15 1.18 1.02
abs error .16 .13 .22 .16 .34 .22 .36 .28 .48 .14
|
25 rookies' minutes have gone up an average of 5% since first appearing on the lists. Their TO, Stl, and Blk have dropped 15-20%.
Absolute error (change) is as a fraction of the total (ratio). Smaller quantities (Stl, Blk) tend to have larger % changes.
Rebounding is the least changed (most predicted) production, varying by an average of just 16% from earliest measurement. Darrell Arthur (Mem) has dropped by far the most (35%) from his first (77 min) projection. _________________ `
39% of all statistics are wrong |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UGA Hayes
Joined: 30 Jun 2007 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You know I caught a few minutes of the Memphis game, and I have to say I was somewhat impressed. He is mobile, not outrageously skinny, and frankly looks like he knows what he is doing out there which can be half the battle with bigs. Also, his teammates seem to have a degree of confidence in him b/c they actually will give him the ball when he is in there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike G
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 3294 Location: Delphi, Indiana
|
Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe this was just about small sample size. But in 120 minutes, Mr Haddadi got 47 rebounds, hit .543 on 44 true shot attempts, with 9 turnovers and 8 assists, 12 blocks and one steal.
That is roughly one 'event' per minute of play, not counting 'rebounds not grabbed', 'shots unblocked', etc. 14 pts, 14 reb, and 3.6 blocks per 36 minutes is still pretty good. Also 6 fouls and 2.8 TO.
If a guy hits 50 of his first 60 FT, we can safely bet that he's a pretty good FT shooter. Why don't we say 60 is a 'small sample' in this case?
This guy led his team, by wide margins, in OReb%, DReb%, Blk%, DRtg, and PER.
Also above the team median in TS%, Usg%, Ast%.
Below avg TO% and Stl%
http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/MEM/2009.html _________________ `
39% of all statistics are wrong |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
THWilson
Joined: 19 Jul 2005 Posts: 164 Location: phoenix
|
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mike G wrote: | | If a guy hits 50 of his first 60 FT, we can safely bet that he's a pretty good FT shooter. Why don't we say 60 is a 'small sample' in this case? |
FTA are identical trials, minutes in a game are not.
As an extreme example:
Steve Kerr had 1,599 3PA, Haddadi has played 7,200 seconds.
Clearly 7,200 > 1,599, but we know with much more confidence about Kerr's shooting than anything about Haddidi: the units are incomparable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|